Back to the record

District 3 · 2026

Susan Winder

Susan Hightower Winder is a 2026 candidate for the Maricopa County Community College District (MCCCD) Governing Board, District 3.

Maricopa Community College Board Election 2026: candidates and dates

Winder wants ICE at the polls. She is a proud Trump voter and wants to defund our community colleges. $142 owed to her HOA led to a foreclosure judgment, and she wants to oversee a $1.39 billion budget.

Frame from Susan Winder’s 2026 campaign video: Winder mid-sentence, in a green top and glasses.
Frame from Winder’s own 2026 campaign video at 0:08 (Instagram, @change4maricopa, September 1, 2026). See the original post

Susan Winder wants a seat overseeing Maricopa’s public colleges. Her own posts and answers show where she stands, and in her 2024 school-board race she listed election deniers as endorsers.

Individual attribution

Winder’s record.

Records about Winder, each with its original source. Where another person or group said or did it, the card names them.

Social extremism

Winder wants ICE at the polls.

“A. Absolutely 300% support ice raids. I'd love to see ice at every polling place”

Susan Winder, @smartypants1948, September 22, 2026

Asked on X whether she supports ICE, Winder answered that she supports ICE raids “300%” and would love to see ICE “at every polling place.”

Polling places should feel safe for every eligible voter. Our colleges need leaders who believe that.

Context

The reply came from @smartypants1948, the account Sandra Christensen’s campaign tagged as Susan Winder when endorsing her for this seat. A college board has no power over immigration enforcement.

Sources: Susan Winder’s reply on X about ICE (X, @smartypants1948) The post Winder replied to (X, @MelG_Gibson) Sandra Christensen’s endorsement tagging Winder’s account (X, @SandraForAZ) Screenshot Screenshot of X. Mel G.Gibson, @MelG_Gibson, September 21: “Lets test that claim! A. SUPPORT ICE B. AGAINST ICE”, with an image of TV commentator Jessica Tarlov captioned “JESSICA TARLOV SAYS MOST AMERICANS ARE AGAINST ICE RAIDS. LET’S TEST THAT CLAIM. ARE YOU FOR OR AGAINST THE RAIDS?” Reply from Susan Winder, @smartypants1948, September 22: “A. Absolutely 300% support ice raids. I'd love to see ice at every polling place”.

Winder questioned whether anyone died of COVID.

“We still have questions about where it came from and how it spread as well as truely how many people died from it if any.”

Susan Winder, 2024 questionnaire

Asked in 2024 whether school districts can mandate whatever health precautions they deem necessary in a pandemic, including masks and vaccines, Winder chose Strongly Disagree and wrote that questions remain about how many people died from COVID, “if any.”

Context

Winder’s answer in the 2024 Paradise Valley school-board race. She now asks voters for a seat overseeing Maricopa’s public colleges.

Source: Susan Winder: 2024 candidate questionnaire (iVoterGuide) Screenshot Screenshot of Susan Winder’s 2024 iVoterGuide answer. Statement: “In the event of a pandemic, school districts can mandate whatever health precautions they deem necessary (including masks and vaccines) to protect students and staff.” Winder’s selection: Strongly Disagree. Winder’s comment: “The medical professionals couldn't agree on the topic of covid. We still have questions about where it came from and how it spread as well as truely how many people died from it if any. This decision needs to lie at the state level which is even scarey as some states are very liberal.”

Trump support

Winder is proud she voted for Trump, even though she doesn’t use proper grammar to express it.

“I absolutely are proud I voted for Trump!!!!!!”

Susan Winder, @smartypants1948, July 3, 2026

On July 3, 2026, Winder replied on X that she was proud she voted for Trump.

Context

X now shows the post Winder answered as coming from a suspended account, so its wording is not available at the original link. Her reply stands on its own.

Sources: Susan Winder’s reply on X about voting for Trump (X, @smartypants1948) Sandra Christensen’s endorsement tagging Winder’s account (X, @SandraForAZ) Screenshot Screenshot of X. Notice: “This Post is from a suspended account.” Reply from Susan Winder, @smartypants1948, 6:09 AM, July 3, 2026: “I absolutely are proud I voted for Trump!!!!!!”

Education extremism

Winder cheered legislation that will harm part-time students: it lowers their federal loan limits.

“Thank you Trump and congress!”

Susan Winder, @smartypants1948, July 7, 2025

Winder replied “Thank you Trump and congress!” to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s post praising the One Big Beautiful Bill’s tax provisions. The same law lowered federal loan limits for part-time students and tightened Pell Grant eligibility for some students, as Maricopa Community Colleges explains.

Lower loan limits make it harder for part-time students to afford college.

Context

Bessent’s post discussed taxes, not education, and Winder’s reply does not show she knew about each education provision. The same law also opened Pell Grants to short workforce training programs starting July 1, 2026.

Sources: Susan Winder’s reply thanking Trump and Congress (X, @smartypants1948) Scott Bessent’s post Winder replied to (X, @SecScottBessent) Maricopa Community Colleges: changes to federal student aid Federal Student Aid: Pell eligibility for workforce programs (U.S. Department of Education, Federal Student Aid) Screenshot Screenshot of a thread on X. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, @SecScottBessent, July 7, 2025: “The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is now permanent thanks to the One Big Beautiful Bill. This legislation will unleash a manufacturing renaissance through pro-growth policies like the 100% expensing of equipment and 100% expensing for factory and agriculture structures.” His post includes a CNBC video still. Reply from Susan Winder, @smartypants1948, 12:19 PM, July 7, 2025: “Thank you Trump and congress!”

Winder wants to defund our community colleges.

“I personally believe that funding for pre-k and college should not come from tax money collected. In the case of special needs students there should be funding provided from pre-K to college.”

Susan Winder, 2024 questionnaire. The last two sentences of her answer on iVoterGuide.

In her 2024 questionnaire, Winder wrote that funding for pre-K and college should not come from tax money, while supporting funding for students with special needs.

“I personally believe that funding for pre-k and college should not come from tax money collected. In the case of special needs students there should be funding provided from pre-K to college.”

Susan Winder, 2024 questionnaire

Context

Winder’s answer came in a 2024 K-12 school-board race while discussing state and federal taxes. It is not a submitted 2026 college-budget proposal.

Sources: Susan Winder: 2024 candidate questionnaire (iVoterGuide) Official 2026 general-election candidates (Maricopa County Elections) Screenshot Screenshot of Susan Winder’s 2024 iVoterGuide answer. Question: “What is your position on government funding of public education from Pre-K through college?” Answer: “The state and federal government tax its citizens. Much of that money goes towards funding public education from Kindergarten to 12th grade. States differ on pre-k funding and college funding. I personally believe that funding for pre-k and college should not come from tax money collected. In the case of special needs students there should be funding provided from pre-K to college.”

Winder said DEI has no place in public education.

“It is clear that there is a divide in our country on diversity, equity and inclusion; however, it has no place in public education.”

Susan Winder, 2024 questionnaire

Asked in 2024 whether she supported diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), Winder selected the strongest disagreement option. Her comment, after noting the national divide over DEI, said “it has no place in public education” and emphasized equal treatment and academic subjects.

It’s clear that she doesn’t understand that DEI actually means fair and equal treatment of students.

Context

This documents her stated position in a K-12 race. It does not establish a specific proposal to eliminate a college program.

Source: Susan Winder: 2024 candidate questionnaire (iVoterGuide) Screenshot Screenshot of Susan Winder’s 2024 iVoterGuide answer. Statement: “I support Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI).” Winder’s selection: Strongly Disagree. Winder’s comment: “It is clear that there is a divide in our country on diversity, equity and inclusion; however, it has no place in public education. From the view point of public education we treat all students equally and foucs on reading, writing and math as well as other subjects. Any of their personal issues don't belong in the public schools. If there are special needs they need to get an IEP or 504 plan. Arizona is ranked 44th out of 50 states in achievement according to US News and World Report.”

Winder opposed gender-affirming providers’ involvement in public schools

Winder’s 2024 questionnaire opposed these providers’ involvement in schools and said that responsibility belongs to parents.

Context

That answer concerned K-12 schools. It is not a documented 2026 proposal about healthcare or services for adult college students.

Source: Susan Winder: 2024 candidate questionnaire (iVoterGuide) Screenshot Screenshot of Susan Winder’s 2024 iVoterGuide answer. Statement: “Abortion and gender-affirming providers, including Planned Parenthood, should be a resource for instruction or services in the school.” Winder’s selection: Strongly Disagree. Winder’s comment: “Any organization connected with gender-affirming providers have no business in the public schools. That is the purview of the parents. In addition it is my opinion any professional in education does not have the background or the education to deal with this. Gender dysphoria is in the DSM manual making it a mental issue for Psychiatrists.”

1776 Project PAC spent independently to support Winder in 2024

A county filing reports $1,900.95 for mail supporting Winder, with first distribution dated October 16, 2024, and $10,545.59 reported cumulatively for her support in that election cycle as of the filing.

Context

The PAC paid a mail vendor for independent advertising in the Paradise Valley school-board race. This was not a contribution to Winder’s committee, and the filing does not establish coordination or support in 2026.

Source: 1776 Project PAC: 2024 independent expenditure filing (Maricopa County Elections)

Money

Winder cannot manage her own budget: $142 owed to her HOA led to a foreclosure judgment on her property.

In August 2025 Susan Winder’s homeowners association sued her in Maricopa County Superior Court. In July 2026 the court found Winder had been delinquent in her account since September 30, 2023; she had written to the court that she planned to meet with the association’s lawyer, but did not respond to its motion. On September 14, 2026, the court entered a “Judgment and Decree of Foreclosure and Order of Sale,” with judgments against her of $142.35 in principal, $7,814.50 in attorney fees and $1,046.73 in costs.

She let $142.35 in unpaid dues rack up more than $8,800 in fees and costs, which has now resulted in a foreclosure judgment and an order to sell her property. Is this the financially responsible person we want overseeing an $884 million operating budget?

Context

This is a homeowners association case, not a mortgage foreclosure. A judgment can be paid before any sale, and the docket shows no sale as of October 1, 2026. She represented herself. The district’s adopted FY2026-27 budget plans $884.5 million in General Fund spending, its main operating fund, and $1.39 billion across all funds. The ruling linked here is a copy redacted by this site: we removed the addresses and the names of the other defendants.

Sources: Maricopa County Superior Court: case CV2025-030062 Maricopa County Superior Court: ruling of July 6, 2026, in CV2025-030062 (redacted copy) (Maricopa County Superior Court (copy redacted by this site)) Maricopa Community Colleges: adopted FY2026-27 budget (Maricopa County Community College District) Screenshot Screenshot of the Maricopa County Superior Court case history, cropped by this site. Case Number: CV2025-030062. Judge: Kreamer, Joseph. File Date: 8/21/2025. Location: Downtown. Case Type: Civil. Docket entry 9/14/2026, JUD - Judgment, note: JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF FORECLOSURE AND ORDER OF SALE. Judgments, 9/14/2026, for Silvertree Homeowners Association, against Susan Winder: $1,046.73 one time, Costs; $7,814.50 one time, Attorney Fee; $142.35 one time, Principal.

Winder called Paradise Valley Unified’s $340 million school bond “ridiculous.” It was for repairs, safety, technology and buses.

At an October 2023 Paradise Valley school board meeting, in a video she posted herself, Winder said what she called “this violation of my rights” would keep her from voting yes on the district’s bond. The bond, on the November 2023 ballot, was a $340 million request the district said would maintain existing facilities, comply with safety regulations, upgrade technology, and buy furniture, equipment and school buses. Voters approved it.

“Were I a wealthy person I would hire that attorney and sue you. You work for us, the taxpayers … You are spending our money that we give you for schools. This violation of my rights will keep me from voting yes on your ridiculous total amount Bond request.”

Susan Winder, October 2023

As a voter, Winder tied her vote on a bond for school repairs, safety and buses to her dispute with the board over public comment and a records request. Most voters approved it.

Context

Speaking as a taxpayer in the district, Winder objected that the board had moved public comment to after its voting items and said a records request had not returned all the emails she asked for. Quote shortened; the cut is marked with ….

Sources: Susan Winder speaks at the PVUSD school board, October 2023 (Susan Winder on YouTube (@ElectSusanWinder)) Paradise Valley Unified: 2023 bond election (Paradise Valley Unified School District) KTAR: results from the 2023 Maricopa County jurisdictional elections (KTAR News) Screenshot Screenshot of the YouTube video “Susan Winder speaks PVUSD School Board Meeting Oct2023” on Winder’s channel, ElectSusanWinder, paused at 1:24 of 1:38. Susan Winder stands at the podium, seen from behind, facing the Paradise Valley Unified School District board. Winder says: “Were I a wealthy person I would hire that attorney and sue you. You work for us, the taxpayers … You are spending our money that we give you for schools. This violation of my rights will keep me from voting yes on your ridiculous total amount Bond request.”

Election denial

Winder cited “illegal people” to call for tighter voter registration.

Asked in 2024 whether people should be able to vote without photo identification, Winder chose Strongly Disagree and wrote that “so many illegal people” in the country require tighter voter registration and cleaned-up voter rolls.

“Unfortunately we have so many illegal people in the US that we need to really tighten up voter regisration and verification. Voter rolls need to be cleaned up which is not in total being done.”

Susan Winder, 2024 questionnaire

Context

Winder’s 2024 school-board questionnaire. Two years later she wrote that she would love to see ICE at every polling place.

Source: Susan Winder: 2024 candidate questionnaire (iVoterGuide) Screenshot Screenshot of Susan Winder’s 2024 iVoterGuide answer. Statement: “People should be able to vote without photo identification.” Winder’s selection: Strongly Disagree. Winder’s comment: “Unfortunately we have so many illegal people in the US that we need to really tighten up voter regisration and verification. Voter rolls need to be cleaned up which is not in total being done.”

Hamadeh endorsed Winder in 2024, by her account. In 2022 he said 2020 was “clearly” rigged.

Winder listed Abraham Hamadeh among her endorsers in 2024. In a 2022 attorney general debate reported by ABC News, asked whether he felt the 2020 election was rigged, Hamadeh, then the Republican nominee, said “clearly.” In 2024 the Arizona Court of Appeals rejected his later challenges to his 2022 loss as filed too late.

Context

Winder reported this endorsement herself on her 2024 questionnaire. The record is Hamadeh’s own; she chose to list him.

Sources: Susan Winder: 2024 candidate questionnaire (iVoterGuide) ABC News: Arizona attorney general candidates on the 2020 election KAWC: Court rejects Hamadeh’s claims about Maricopa County ballots (KAWC (Capitol Media Services))

Kolodin endorsed Winder in 2024, by her account. In 2023 he was disciplined over his 2020 election lawsuits.

Winder listed Alexander Kolodin among her endorsers in 2024 (her questionnaire spells the name “Alex Klondin”). In 2023 he agreed to accept State Bar punishment, including 18 months of probation, for his actions while representing clients who challenged the results of the 2020 election, including a dismissed lawsuit by Arizona’s so-called fake electors that asked a court to throw out all of Maricopa County’s mail-in ballots. NBC News reports he led several lawsuits to overturn the results of the 2020 and 2022 elections in Arizona. In July 2026, Trump endorsed him for Arizona secretary of state.

Context

Winder reported this endorsement herself on her 2024 questionnaire. The record is Kolodin’s own; Winder chose to list him.

Sources: Susan Winder: 2024 candidate questionnaire (iVoterGuide) KJZZ: State Bar disciplines Arizona lawmaker who represented fake electors NBC News: Alexander Kolodin, who tried to overturn Arizona election results, wins GOP nod KJZZ: Trump endorses Alexander Kolodin for Arizona secretary of state

Bolick endorsed Winder in 2024, by her account. In 2022 Bolick said she would not have certified Arizona’s 2020 election.

“My opinion, at the time, I would not have certified it.”

Shawnna Bolick, June 2022 debate, reported by KJZZ

Winder listed Shawnna Bolick among her endorsers in 2024. In a June 2022 debate for secretary of state, reported by KJZZ, Bolick said she would not have certified Arizona’s 2020 results without forensic audits in all 15 counties. Told that would have meant breaking the law, she replied, “Yeah. And that would have been fine.” NBC News called her “another 2020 election denier.” In December 2020 she signed the resolution asking Congress to accept Arizona’s “alternate” electoral votes for Trump, and in 2021 she said her bill HB 2720 would give the Legislature back the power to certify the electors.

Context

Winder reported this endorsement herself on her 2024 questionnaire. The record is Bolick’s own; Winder chose to list her. KJZZ quoted Kori Lorick, Arizona’s state election director, as saying that under the statute certification “is a mandatory responsibility.”

Sources: Susan Winder: 2024 candidate questionnaire (iVoterGuide) KJZZ: How would the next Arizona secretary of state handle future elections? Look back to 2020 (KJZZ (Ben Giles)) NBC News: Election denier Mark Finchem wins Arizona GOP secretary of state primary Joint Resolution of the 54th Legislature, December 14, 2020 (Gohmert v. Pence, Exhibit A) (U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas (via CourtListener)) Rep. Shawnna Bolick: press release on HB 2720 (Arizona House of Representatives)

Winder listed three 2020 election deniers as endorsers, and misspelled one of their names.

On her 2024 iVoterGuide questionnaire, Winder reported Shawnna Bolick, Walt Blackman, “Alex Klondin” (her misspelling of Alex Kolodin) and Abraham Hamadeh as endorsers. Hamadeh said 2020 was “clearly” rigged. NBC News reports that Kolodin led lawsuits to overturn Arizona’s 2020 and 2022 election results. He was also disciplined over his 2020 cases. Bolick said she would not have certified Arizona’s 2020 results.

These are the people Winder chose to list behind her.

Context

The questionnaire spells Kolodin’s name “Klondin.” The full record of each election denier Winder listed, with its sources, is on her page.

Sources: Susan Winder: 2024 candidate questionnaire (iVoterGuide) ABC News: Arizona attorney general candidates on the 2020 election KJZZ: State Bar disciplines Arizona lawmaker who represented fake electors NBC News: Alexander Kolodin, who tried to overturn Arizona election results, wins GOP nod KJZZ: How would the next Arizona secretary of state handle future elections? Look back to 2020 (KJZZ (Ben Giles)) Screenshot Screenshot of the Endorsements section of Susan Winder’s 2024 iVoterGuide page. Note: “*These endorsements were received after the deadline and were not considered in the Panel Evaluations and are for additional educational purposes only.” Conservative (2): “*Arizona Women of Action” and “1776 Project Pac”. Reported by candidate (1): “Shawnna Bolick, Walt Blackman, Alex Klondin and Abraham Hamadeh”.

Shared attribution

The Change4Maricopa slate Winder chose.

These records concern all three Change4Maricopa candidates alike.

Turning Point PAC picked Winder, Crow and Caracciolo.

Turning Point PAC’s 2026 Freedom Ticket lists Susan Winder for District 3, Ryan Caracciolo for District 4 and John Crow for the at-large seat on the community college board.

Context

Turning Point PAC produces, pays for and publishes the Freedom Ticket. The PAC says it does not consult candidates, and the listings carry no endorsement badge, so they are its recommendations. Enter a Maricopa County address at the link to see its community college picks for that address.

Source: Turning Point PAC: The 2026 Freedom Ticket Screenshot Screenshot of ticket.tppac.com/ticket, The 2026 Freedom Ticket. Community College Board, District 3: Susan Winder, Non-Partisan. Community College Board, District 4: Ryan Caracciolo, Non-Partisan. Community College Board, At-Large: John Crow, Non-Partisan.

The website of Winder, Crow and Caracciolo publishes a 2020 election denier.

“…help our president [Trump] get back into office.”

Linda Brickman, quoted by the Arizona Mirror, November 20, 2020. Brackets are ours.

Change4Maricopa, the website all three candidates authorize, published an article by Linda Brickman after she interviewed the three over lunch. In 2020, as a Maricopa County Republican Party leader, she wrote “certification denied” beside her signature on the county’s voting-equipment accuracy test. The Arizona Mirror reported that she said the machines were working properly, and it described her dissent as aimed at overturning the election result; it quoted her saying she signed that way “to help our president get back into office.” A May 2026 joehoft.com post, with a postscript signed by Brickman, recounts that refusal.

“It is most important that we sign the way it was necessary to sign to help our president get back into office.”

Linda Brickman, quoted by the Arizona Mirror, November 20, 2020

They chose to publish her on their campaign website.

Context

The article on their website is about community colleges, not elections. Elections officials said her 2020 notation meant nothing, the Mirror reported. The Mirror also quoted her saying, “And if he didn’t win officially, I guess we have to live with those results.” The candidates chose to publish her article on their joint site.

Sources: Change4Maricopa: article by Linda Brickman Hatlady’s reflection of the 2020 election process (joehoft.com) Arizona Mirror: Maricopa County GOP chair rejects accuracy test to help Trump “get back into office” Screenshot Two screenshots stacked by this site. Top: the Change4Maricopa website, article “How We Destroyed Community College Education for Generations of Students and Why We Need a Reset,” September 24, 2026, “By Linda Brickman.” Bottom: the Arizona Mirror, November 20, 2020, showing her signature with “certification denied” written beside it, and her quoted words: “It is most important that we sign the way it was necessary to sign to help our president get back into office.” Brickman also said: “And if he didn’t win officially, I guess we have to live with those results. I’m not going to sit there and protest, but I will stand behind him 110%.” Punctuation adapted by this site.

Winder, Crow and Caracciolo run as one ticket, on one website.

Winder, Crow and Caracciolo campaign together as Change4Maricopa. The slate’s joint website is paid for by all three campaign committees and authorized by all three candidates.

“Paid for by John David Crow For Maricopa County Community College Board, Elect Ryan Caracciolo, and Winder for MCCCB. Authorized by John Crow, Ryan Caracciolo and Susan Winder.”

Change4Maricopa website footer, checked September 29, 2026

One ticket, one website, one platform. A vote for the ticket is a vote for Winder’s record.

Context

Running together does not mean each candidate said what the others said. Every card on this site names who said or did what.

Source: Change4Maricopa: shared campaign platform Screenshot Footer of the Change4Maricopa website: the Change4Maricopa logo, Facebook and Instagram icons, the links “Privacy Policy” and “Terms and Conditions”, the campaign’s contact email (covered by this site), and this line, shown in capital letters: “Paid for by John David Crow For Maricopa County Community College Board, Elect Ryan Caracciolo, and Winder for MCCCB. Authorized by John Crow, Ryan Caracciolo and Susan Winder.”

Winder, Crow and Caracciolo promise to bring football back. Their numbers don’t add up to a viable budget.

All three jointly promise to bring back junior-college football. The figures they and their site point to don’t match: on FOX 10, Crow said “let’s say it’s a million and a half” for the program and cited about $1.1 million in tuition from its players; the article on their own site cites the district’s 2018 estimates of about $770,000 a year for four programs and more than $20 million that could eventually be needed for capital improvements; and the unsigned plan their football page links relies on a new student fee that it says must rise with inflation: “Indexing is essential: without it, every version eventually falls short.” In a 2019 Northeast Valley News report, a district spokesman said the primary factor in ending football was “the financial viability of sustaining these programs long term.”

Three numbers, no budget. Nothing they have published shows football would be financially viable, and Winder wrote that college should not be paid for with tax money, except for students with special needs. Students could be left to pay.

Context

Supporters’ experiences deserve consideration. The article on the slate’s site says Crow proposes a “phased public-private model” with fundraising and sponsorships, and that Caracciolo proposes sponsorships, private fundraising and partnerships; as described, neither includes a dollar figure. Crow’s figure was an annual cost; the $20 million was a one-time capital estimate that the district never itemized and that was disputed at the time. In 2018 the district also cited flat enrollment and the end of state support.

Sources: Change4Maricopa: shared campaign platform Change4Maricopa: football campaign page Change4Maricopa: article by Linda Brickman FOX 10 Talks with John Crow and Ryan Caracciolo, September 15, 2026 (FOX 10 Phoenix) Football “Strategic Framework” linked from Change4Maricopa (unsigned) (Unsigned document linked from Change4Maricopa) ABC15: Maricopa Community Colleges eliminating football programs after 2018 (ABC15 Arizona) Northeast Valley News: the lawsuit over the end of community college football Screenshot Screenshot of the football page of the Change4Maricopa website under the heading “YOUR CANDIDATES THAT WILL BRING JUCO FOOTBALL BACK”, listing Ryan Caracciolo, District 4; John David Crow, Member at Large; and Susan Winder, District 3.

Winder, Crow and Caracciolo’s site links a football plan whose new $2-per-credit fee must keep rising with inflation, or it eventually falls short.

The slate’s joint campaign site now links an unsigned football plan and financial model. In its illustration of how to pay for football, the plan adds a new Student Life & Athletics Fee of $2 per credit hour on top of tuition and says it must rise with inflation, to about $4.07 by 2054: “Indexing is essential: without it, every version eventually falls short.” Up to 60% of the fee goes to football after launch. As one way to lower that fee, it lists a property tax increase of $1 million a year dedicated to the fund.

“In this illustration the fee is new, and it is an increase. It is $2 per credit hour on top of tuition, which has been $97 per credit since FY2024. … Indexing is essential: without it, every version eventually falls short.”

Unsigned football plan linked from Change4Maricopa, captured October 1 and 2, 2026

Football doesn’t pay for itself. The plan their website links would add a new fee to every credit, raising tuition, and says the fee should rise with inflation, subject to annual Board approval. And Winder wrote in 2024 that college should not be paid for with tax money, except for students with special needs.

Context

The plan and model name no author or date; as of October 1, 2026, we found no candidate calling them their own. Their joint site links them under “YOUR CANDIDATES THAT WILL BRING JUCO FOOTBALL BACK.” The plan calls itself “an illustration for public discussion, not a final plan,” and the model says its projections “are not forecasts, budgets or financing commitments.” The plan says “any new fee or tax should be a last resort,” models the fee on a $2 student activity fee that, it says, the district combined with tuition in 2014, and gives the rest of the fee to existing sports and student life at all 10 colleges. The property tax increase is one of several optional ways to lower the fee, not part of its base case: the plan lists “a property tax increase of $1 million a year dedicated to the fund, roughly 16 cents a year per $100,000 of home value” as “Board-discretionary (within the Board’s authority, not yet adopted),” and its own options table calls it “a tax increase: a last resort requiring a Truth in Taxation hearing.” The $4.07 figure is in future dollars. The plan sets a $5.0 million planning allowance for facility improvements; in 2018 the district said the programs could require more than $20 million in capital improvements and associated expenses. The model builds about $26 million of capital capacity through 2054. Linda Brickman’s September 24 article on the same site described Crow’s proposal as a “phased public-private model” with fundraising and sponsorships, and Caracciolo’s as sponsorships, private fundraising and partnerships; it did not propose a student fee. The quote above joins two passages, marked with …: the fee paragraph, and the last sentence of the plan’s indexing term, which begins “Indexed to inflation after the first season, subject to annual Board approval.”

Sources: Football “Strategic Framework” linked from Change4Maricopa (unsigned) (Unsigned document linked from Change4Maricopa) Football “Financial Model” linked from Change4Maricopa (unsigned) (Unsigned spreadsheet linked from Change4Maricopa) Change4Maricopa: football campaign page Screenshot Two passages from the football plan linked from the Change4Maricopa website, cropped and joined by this site: “In this illustration the fee is new, and it is an increase. It is $2 per credit hour on top of tuition, which has been $97 per credit since FY2024. … Indexing is essential: without it, every version eventually falls short.” The second passage, under “Key terms,” reads in full: “Indexed to inflation after the first season, subject to annual Board approval. The fee reaches about $2.61 in FY2039 ($78 a year full-time) and $4.07 in FY2054 ($122). Indexing is essential: without it, every version eventually falls short.”

Winder tells voters to vote for her, Crow and Caracciolo.

In her campaign video on the Change4Maricopa slate’s Instagram account, Winder closes by naming her running mates and their seats. The video ends on a card paid for by all three campaigns and authorized by all three candidates.

“So remember vote Ryan Caracciolo who is on the West Side and John Crow who is member at large and Susan Winder who is in central Phoenix. Thank you.”

Susan Winder, September 1, 2026

She asks for your vote for the whole ticket, not just her.

Context

The frames show the video’s own on-screen captions, which split the sentence across three screens, and its end card. The quote was checked by listening.

Source: Change4Maricopa on Instagram: Susan Winder campaign video (Instagram, @change4maricopa) Screenshot Four frames from Susan Winder’s campaign video, set in a grid by this site. At 1:15 the on-screen caption reads “so remember vote Ryan Caracciolo who is on the West Side”. At 1:18 it reads “and John Crow who is member at large”. At 1:21 it reads “and Susan Winder who is in central Phoenix”. The end card at 1:24 reads “Paid for by John David Crow For Maricopa County Community College Board, Elect Ryan Caracciolo, and Winder For MCCB. Authorized by John Crow, Ryan Caracciolo, and Susan Winder.” Winder says: “So remember vote Ryan Caracciolo who is on the West Side and John Crow who is member at large and Susan Winder who is in central Phoenix. Thank you.”

Crow says he is running with Caracciolo and Winder. Crow’s video misspells both their names.

In his campaign video on the Change4Maricopa slate’s Instagram account, Crow names both running mates and the parts of the county they would represent. The video’s own on-screen captions spell their names “Carrasciolo” and “Wender.” It ends on the same card paid for and authorized by all three.

“I'm running with a highly qualified team of professionals like Ryan Caracciolo in the West Valley and Susan Winder in the Central Valley all the way up north to Anthem.”

John David Crow, September 1, 2026

They ask for your vote as one team. Their own video gets two of their names wrong.

Context

The captions are burned into the video the Change4Maricopa slate posted; its end card spells both names correctly. The quote follows what he says, checked by listening.

Source: Change4Maricopa on Instagram: John Crow campaign video (Instagram, @change4maricopa) Screenshot Four frames from John Crow’s campaign video, set in a grid by this site. At 0:54 the on-screen caption reads “I'm running with a highly qualified team of professionals”. At 0:56 it reads “like Ryan Carrasciolo in the West Valley”. At 0:58 it reads “and Susan Wender in the Central Valley”. The end card at 1:21 reads “Paid for by John David Crow For Maricopa County Community College Board, Elect Ryan Caracciolo, and Winder For MCCB. Authorized by John Crow, Ryan Caracciolo, and Susan Winder.” Crow says: “I'm running with a highly qualified team of professionals like Ryan Caracciolo in the West Valley and Susan Winder in the Central Valley all the way up north to Anthem.”

See the financial context and questions to answer